After a lull of several weeks, we can finally discuss the hot new release from DC Comics. Why suddenly such low reviews?? Is it worth going to the cinema, or is it better to sit at home and watch the new season of Daredevil?? Let’s find out. And after that, we’ll discuss the homework, which was chosen perfectly, as never before. Finally, we will be able to clearly discuss the topic of the last issue: so what is the difference between the ratings of critics and users?
So, the agenda:
-News;
-"Batman v Superman": Kungurov refuses to discuss Snyder;
-“Daredevil”, season two: why go to the cinema at all when there is something like this?
-Celebrych briefly reports for the missed episode: “The Divider” and “My name is Khan”;
-"Equilibrium": 4.8 criticism, 7.5 IMDB. WTF??
-“Tulse Luper’s Suitcases”: 582 ratings on Kinopoisk. Rare cinema!
The time and place do not change, but the composition returns to the same.
www.twitch.tv/stopgameru
Best comments
Oh damn, Equilibrium has https://xsinocasino.co.uk/login/ a 33 on metacritic. I just can’t believe it – it’s a great movie that I once watched several times with great pleasure.
Please note that this is good naive children’s fairy tale. Damn, 33 – these are films of the “slag” level. Pixels and Fantastic Four have 27 each, and freaking grayscale has 46.
Equilibrium is far from slag. Very far away. It is highly rated by users everywhere – on IMDB, on Kinopoisk, and on the same metacritic.
I don’t understand. I’ll come listen to the celebrity, he usually has an understanding of the opinions of critics. And somehow I think the point here is not the naivety of the idea.
I wanted to point out that the series is great, highlight a couple of scenes and tell everyone to watch it. After two weeks, the daredevil will no longer be newsworthy, so it’s better to mention it if there is at least some opportunity than to ignore it completely. Don’t you find it??
I will add that “Ghost. » watch either with subs from Antravoco, or with voice acting based on them. Other translations – especially Channel One dubbing! – a rare bucket.
Here’s a detailed breakdown if you’re interested.
http://adomatic.livejournal.com/63788.html
Current table of cinema donations. Edits are accepted for consideration! (two top films of next week have already dropped out of it)
In fact, there was a cunning plan to try to invite myself to visit for one issue, but there are fears that tomorrow I will be up to my neck in polishing the latest issue of the Fallout IP. There will be a free window sooner this evening
Regarding Bps: the film, of course, is not as bad as critics say, but it has huge problems with the plot.
Lex Luthor lacks motivation and Jesse Eisenberg plays the Joker at all. Superman has the dumbest and most idiotic reason for fighting Batman. And the appearance of the miracle woman is explained: “Well, I saw your makhach and flew in to take part.”
I also can’t help but note the “Brilliant” cameos of other super heroes Through 3 alternating 20 second videos in the middle of the film, the whole point of which is: “Watch! We have other super heroes.". And also a flash from the future, which warns Batman about the danger, to which he successfully ignores.
Actually, the battle between Batman and Superman, which lasts 10 minutes in the last quarter of the film. Doomsday, who not only looks like a troll from VK, but is also “born” just like an Uruk-hai. And, naturally, the main plot twist of the whole film: FUCK IT WOULD BE TO KILL SUPERMAN 10 MINUTES BEFORE THE FILM END AND RESURRECT HIM AT THE VERY END.
FUCK YOU? WHAT IS THIS, A PLOT PLOT??
BUT WHY? WHY KILL A CHARACTER AND RESURRECT HIM IN THE SAME FILM? THIS IS JUST STUPID. It’s just… Eh.
And the actors play well, and Affleck played Batman absolutely perfectly. And the music is not bad. But the movie is just boring and long as hell. The characters lack any sane motivation. There’s simply no point in stretching the film out to 2 and a half hours.
For me the film is 6/10, and yes, the critics were a little too nasty for it.